Archive for category Eco Trust Land Acq.
Finally the FED gets it RIGHT. FINALLY
Posted by greensciences in 2011 Energy Report, 2011 Power Report, Bio-Composites, Bio-gas, Biorefinery, CAD/BIM/GIS, Cellulosic Bio Refinery, Eco Trust Land Acq., FSC Lumber, Fuel Cells, Green Jobs, Green Lending, Green Parks, Green Schools, Green Sustainable Future, Greenhouses, GTL, integrate CAD/BIM/GIS, Integrated Farming, M & A, Master Planning, Oil Prices, Permaculture, Power Towers, Regional and Community banks, Restructure & Recapitization, Restructure Reports, Seeds, Solar, STE, TES Thermal Energy Storage, Waste To Energy, Water and Waste Treatment, Wind on August 9, 2011
The question becomes how long with that last. If they stick to their guns, we might begin to see the value levels that are real relative to current market conditions. Once there, we might begin to rebuild from the base valuations which have been hidden by past FED ACTION.
MAYBE JUST MAYBE, we might begin to build a new alternative energy sustainable future, when they learn to stay out of the way.
We shall see.
As for us, We ARE READY.
Green Capitalism Expanding
Posted by greensciences in BioBased, Bioneers, Eco Trust Land Acq., Economic Justice, Economic Policy, Green Cities, Green Design, Green Job Training & Education, Green Jobs, Green Lending, Green Sustainable Future, green transportation, Master Planning, Permaculture on February 24, 2011
Green Opportunities: The KEY. Superior performance at lower costs
Nature Is Up For A Vote
Posted by greensciences in 2011 Power Report, BACT, Campaign Finance Reform, Eco Trust Land Acq., Economic Policy, Energy Policy, Green Cities, Green Design, Green Edu., Green Jobs, Green Lending, Green Sustainable Future, integrate CAD/BIM/GIS, Master Planning on February 22, 2011
Looks like it was voted down in the new House with the objective to take away all EPA ability to regulate green house gases. So much for BACT, much less LAER. Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate.
This means we will not be looking to acquire any old energy designs any time soon. FORGET IT. Those old energy plants will just keep on running as they always have. At least until a Veto or the Senate goes to bat. NO WAY YOU BASE A BUSINESS MODEL ON THIS POLITICAL FOOTBALL. If people don’t care where their power and fuel comes from, the low cost provider WINS.
FAR BETTER TO BUILD NEW NOW with LAER & the objective of being the low cost Green provider.
SOME IN THIS COUNTRY MAY START TO CARE.
Biofuels should replace M.E. Imports
Posted by 2011wd in 2011 Power Report, Algae, BTL, Eco Trust Land Acq., Energy Conservation is JOB 1, Energy Policy, Green Cars, Green Cities, Green Design, Green Edu., Green Jobs, Green Lending, Green Sustainable Future, green transportation, GTL, integrate CAD/BIM/GIS, Progressive Leadership on January 31, 2011
CANADA 1,975
MEXICO 1,229
VENEZUELA 884
BRAZIL 188 This is an ideal working partner source country.
COLOMBIA 489
RUSSIA 553
ALGERIA 379
Advanced Biofuels should be ramped up to replace M.E. Imports as conservation also improves. BTL, or GTL, the future numbers must exceed current projected increases. This sustainable fuels effort would utilize feedstocks that are not food crop oriented. These fuels would support sustainable forest objectives. These biofuels should be in the black on their own merit without subsidies. These biofuels feedstocks would be no till & organic. This is only possible as permaculture integration becomes the norm.
Most have simply missed this important aspect.
This is a long term effort that will require a national scope as it is proven on a regional level. Sustainable Distribution models will begin to produce meaningful advantages as they are designed and developed.
Important algae research should be supported and valued.
Interesting observations from a VC perspective…
Bio-Energy Consulting will center around strategic Integration insight
Posted by 2011wd in BioBased, Biology, BTL, Cellulosic Bio Refinery, Consulting Services Division, CSS carbon sequestration & storage, Eco Trust Land Acq., Economic Policy, Energy Policy, Favorite People, Female Leadership, Green Building Materials, Recycled Building Materials, Waste To Energy, Water and Waste Treatment on January 22, 2011
As the Strategic Integration Officer is added to our energy solutions consulting div., we look forward to offering those services to select VCs & COs who have exhibited an understanding of the merits of sustainable energy integration.
From our viewpoint, KA, is well suited for this complex, science based, role. This shown, in large part, by past efforts with the same type national integration scope.
As we touch base over the coming months, she will be the person recommended to assist your sustainable integrated energy science efforts.
jp
All consulting services are offered to first choice potential working partners only.
Those potential long term relationships may well start with integration consulting agreements.
KA’s bio and resume upon request to principals only.
It’s time to go to work. We need to clean up this NATION, NOW.
Posted by 2011wd in 2011 Power Report, 400, Advanced Building Materials, Agri Char, Bio-Composites, Bio-gas, BioBased, Bioneers, CCSC, Eco Trust Land Acq., Economic Justice, Green Design, Green Job Training & Education, M & A, Master Planning, Permaculture, Recycled Building Materials, Waste To Energy, Water and Waste Treatment on January 14, 2011
It is time to put people back to work cleaning up this country. Should have been done two years ago, however no time like the present. As Remediation has always been at the very heart of our efforts, now is the time to build out that business model in full force.
If you are in remediation, engineering, CAD/BIM/GIS design and biobased, we want to talk to you. It is time to form the very best biobased remediation team we are able to form and start getting the job done on the ground.
For those wanting to wait, we simply say, GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY & GO PLAY GOLF.
The WAITING IS OVER.
We will consider power properties for clean conversion solutions.
Posted by 2011wd in 2010 Energy Report, CCS, CSS carbon sequestration & storage, Eco Trust Land Acq., Green Sustainable Future, integrate CAD/BIM/GIS, M & A, Master Planning, Old Energy Designs, Regional and Community banks, Water and Waste Treatment on December 2, 2010
As ideal projects are located we will work with our private partners to produce estimated conversion costs for each potential Acq. property. This is done, in large part, due to changes in the private funding financial structure. That new structure has recently been proven with a new $2B TRUST which we view as first rate. This rating based on the non profit funds willing to invest. This maybe directly related to timely annual disbursement factors, no doubt attractive, to the TRUST Partners. As our own program moves forward, we are selecting, in the black, green energy working models, that might be assisted by SEEDING. See as news might warrant, footnote.
We will be contacting our long standing private base to secure working partners while reporting back with regard to our own private TRUST as news might warrant. Both big cap and mid cap working partner project cost est. will be added together as needed. This will provide all potential TRUST Holders with total potential cost considerations per possible project Acq.
IT has come to our attention as of Dec. 17, 2010 that a present number for old energy design clean retro fit is projected to be far to small from our viewpoint. Currently we see this from a more advanced clean solutions perspective that is (LAER) by design. Revised and extended remarks are held as private at this time as the numbers become VITAL. The current number that has been used to make this project possible is no where near what we would need to get the job done utilizing (BACT) as we see it, much less (LAER). This disconnect is on the order of less than half of the true projected costs considerations that should be used and even that number may not work. Those who do not get this FACT either don’t care about the environment or don’t understand why it is important to do the JOB right the first time.
This means business development information is limited in scope here, however we do wish to keep our friends posted as to all potential future developments.
This is very important work and it should be done with far more size and speed than we have the time or power to devote to it, however these are very long term green sustainable objectives demanding VAST potential outlays of time, effort, and money that must be considered. Anyone who might wish to agree with the numbers currently provided may simply be fooling themselves with regard to old energy designs and demands, which are extensive. Many of these properties are well over 30 years old.
Such is the nature of alternative energy in America. This new TRUST aspect will change the snail pace seen for the last 22 years, if and only if, real numbers are being used for possible conversion to clean sustainable solutions. That may happen as (BACT) numbers shift to what truly might be regarded as Best Available Control Technology. If we do the JOB it will not only meet (BACT), it will meet (LAER) Lowest Achievable Emission Rate objectives.
As News Might Warrant, See Private File 2112011 via the Bio Energy Strategic Integration Officer.
JP
When should working clean energy models be funded? Should effective land use matter?
only when the feedstocks are a part of an integrated CAD/BIM/GIS total system design will it be possible to see real economic value exhibited on a large scale.
http://1eco.com/category/integrate-cadbimgis/ algae shows feedstock potential in many forms, closed loop design models being one such form however small. closed loop systems do not demand large cost if costs are offset by effective design utilization for other important aspects other than feedstock production. why closed loop, you might ask. Total system design space utilization. case in point. the latest solar array approved for future funding has a total land area demand of over 4 thousand acres. this is poor integrated design however it will be funded.
as for investors. in an attempt to fund the first successful green alternative oil BTL effort, very high risk has been taken with less study than should be required. others are now looking at Carbon sequestration & storage http://1eco.com/category/css-carbon-sequestration-storage/ which would deal directly with the energy issue from a clean burning perspective with old energy system designs. STORAGE becomes their issue, again demanding large land space utilization, which has also been approved for funding. Neither future funded program will be utilizing that land as it should have been, however both are going to be funded. Only when closed loop systems are integrated in a total system design will you begin to see truly effective clean energy system designs. This does not seem to matter at this point in the funding process.
Who is to blame for these short sighted funding choices and why?
-
You are currently browsing the archives for the Eco Trust Land Acq. category.
Flickr Photos
More Photos
