The build-outs will be outdated by the time they are finished and the funding model is all wrong.

The Talk is of concern for estimated construction cost increases.

This is the very reason why you don’t build big in the first phase of advanced research, design, & development.

This is also why you don’t put all your energy design into one system.

We have been talking about this for years and yet few have had the insight to stop and listen to what we are offering to potential working partners.

Start small and stick with what has been working. Make a profit. Then grow from that operations awareness.

If you don’t know what has been working. We can’t help you. Our 1st Choice potential working partners know & have been doing it for years.

A few words on the subject. Your FEEDSTOCKS are wrong. Much less your Temp.

If selecting this Feedstock and Temp….

It is Green Chemistry that comes from the Thermo Conversion Aspects that should be considered. It is the Separation Tech that should be Advanced if you value the true profit potential as we do.

This is old, as in 2009 but it will get you up to speed on the basics, allowing for a new Biomass Fluid Catalytic Cracking (BFCC) Catalysts

Excellent People. Worthy Goal. How you don’t get cost over runs with this type of large scale objective is beyond our, proven small scale, thinking.

This is not some quick fix green race. Rather it is the Energy Business that is attempting to go green over time.

If you forget that long term fact, you will not be around, nor will your investors make money.

Case in point. The talk is of being able to use old energy refiners. Sure the integrated in the mix would like to see this, however the green in anyone who has been in this research work for over 20 years, might say, Wait a minute. Shouldn’t the Hydroprocessing REACTOR be ADVANCED?

Shouldn’t the design of the New Plant be ADVANCED. If all you are doing is talking about a MORE COSTLY Old System the cost over runs are going to be there because the old systems will also need to be advanced.

This was shown as far back as 2004. Where were some of these new green thinkers then? Even old energy Pros know they need to change how they are building their systems. That means cost overruns every time. So much so, that no one wants to go first with any new build because they know it will be outdated before it is finished, see the latest, coming out of Cal

Bottom line is this. Even the Old Energy Systems must be advanced. What is it going to cost and how long is it going to take? Don’t let anyone blow smoke up your butt. No one knows, but you can bet it will cost more and take longer than anyone attempting to promote any new idea truly understands.

Hence the reason you don’t just focus on BTL & GTL. There is far more to consider and if you are not understanding this yet. We can’t help you.

More than Willing to offer up this. It is going to take far more than any new start up can raise with some IPO. That is nothing more tnan a VC pipedream. When we say this is Large Scale, we are addressing the scope & demand of integration. This is the very reason we have been doing this with our own dime. Expect 25 years of R&D with very little hope of Rev., while in research & design mode. Energy is only one piece of a much bigger puzzle. That puzzle must be integrated, closed looped, & designed with a permaculture understanding and awareness. Old Energy doesn’t even have a CLUE in that regard and doesn’t want one either. Anyone attempting to bring green solutions to old energy design models is barking up the wrong tree and will face overruns strong enough to kill a HORSE.

The old energy integrated can afford that. Can you?

, , , ,

Leave a Comment

Joan B Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice

Peace Studies

What will you be leaving behind?

,

Leave a Comment

Endeavor Entrepreneurs receive guidance through House of Genius at SXSW

Endeavor.org

Leave a Comment

National Biomass Map

National Biomass Map

Notice the three GTL aspects at the bottom of the map page.

We would add two more. Seems some have forgotten old energy designs must be a part of the economic equation
in their bio based economic business model evaluations.

This is directly related to wholesale production cost demands which are extensive in all biomass systems.

This the reason why all of our Green sciences research is both, BTL, & GTL, oriented. If you don’t have Water Remediation added to the mix, your plant is outdated and not truly integrated. If Algae is not a major part of that remediation, you’re not thinking sub systems integration.

, , , ,

Leave a Comment

The Catalysts is a vital part of the cost effective bio-refinery. Is the Catalysts plentiful & affordable? Is it Bio Based?

Bio-Catalysts

Biocatalysts

,

Leave a Comment

Kony 2012.

Kony is the International Criminal Court’s Most Wanted Man

,

Leave a Comment

The Two Sinks for Co2. Algae and Agri-Char

If your bio-refinery is truly integrated then you must be advanced in both Algae growth and Agri-Char for the purposes of CO2 Sinks.

It is no longer Carbon Capture and Storage. CCS. It is rather CCSC. Carbon Capture, Storage, & Conversion.

If your not converting CO2 into products, you are missing the clean, green, integration boat.

Dr. Marie Barbosa

, , ,

Leave a Comment

Bio based understanding matters. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Cradle to Cradle. Natural, Organic. Think, Permaculture.

This is what we look for in suppliers. This is what we look for in consulting team members. This is what we look for is green sciences. This is what we look for in all research and study.

FSC Lumber, & Building Materials Matter.

As all FEEDSTOCKS become waste, the choice of biomass is directly related to it’s cradle to cradle, waste VOL.

As BIO-COMPOSITES become a part of the cradle to cradle working green solutions, the question becomes, What do you GROW, & how do you grow it.

Classic example.

Dieffenbacher

Excellent supplier. Wood Composites may become Wood Bio-composites to produce fiber board. The type NO VOC, glue matters. Reducing glue use matters. Energy expense and energy use matters.

They get this because they have been working on green solutions for years. This is the type supplier we are looking for. Think Green, Cost effective and total energy utilization.

, , , ,

1 Comment

Hydroprocessing demands both a cost effective Thermochemical Conversion Platform & a permaculture awareness

At least they are on the thermochemical conversion path.

They are missing the boat from several directions, however just understanding the drop in, fuel and chemical demand. puts this work ahead of most.

Of the $1.4B invested last year, only 1/3 was geared toward Thermochemical. Without the Chemistry, the biology is simply held back, & will remain on hold.

If your biology is not running toward an Algae growth path, or you are still stuck in Corn, Study your closed loop, none crop, biomass objectives, all over again.

If you don’t have permaculture in your design, forget your integration model, it is simply flawed.

If your GTL is OFF, then get out now. You can’t get there from here without this extremely important phase. BTL without GTL advancements is still 5 years away from the projected target yield. If your not addressing the two key price reduction demands now with all your time and money, then you still will not get there.

It’s not a matter of producing. It is a matter of producing at an affordable price over time. Even if you find the price reductions in every key area, operations is still demanded to prove commercial success. The risk from here is still extremely high that no profit will ever be made even with all the work that has been done. This is why, throwing money at the problem has never been the answer. What is required is time for research. Something most simply do not wish to give without the price that is required to be paid. A lifetime of work, while still not knowing if it will be cost effective. That is the true cost of this research.

Anyone who tells you different is blowing smoke up their own rear end and serves you no purpose. You can’t dream up the yield per ton, or pray for the cost per gal. to magically go down, without better science. We have the best in their field exhibiting very exciting promise & yet we are smart enough to know we are still years away from anything proven. We are also smart enough to know the sub systems must be cost effective to BUILD, AS the construction costs must come down, while operating expenses are reduced. The math becomes fuzzy directly related to the size & the never ending cost over runs, which no one wishes to address.

What you don’t do is start out with a production yield objective of 200,000 gals a day. This is throwing money at the problem. Massive mistake.

The only way to get costs in line is to reduce the plant size from the start. If you have fixed numbers per sub system, we are buying. If you have proven operations we are buying. Otherwise don’t waste your time here. The fact that storage, transportation, distribution, expenses, across the board, is not even addressed & speaks vols. to the lack of understanding with regard to total integrated production costs.

This is not simply downstream. This is midstream coming together with downstream. If your not on that over all cost expense demand number, your off by a MILE.

,

Leave a Comment

Ohio Leads the way providing Algaculture, Agriculture Status.

Very important first step for every state, if they truly want Algae growth on a commercial scale.

Those that don’t provide this status approval, simply do not understand the vast no crop, biomass demand that is coming.

Ohio Algaculture provided Agriculture status.

We will not produce without this agriculture status, which has us looking hard at Ohio, NOW.

, , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.